My Garmin Is Sexier Than Yours
I started getting a ton of traffic yesterday to my Anatomy Of A Well-Loved Garmin post.  Apparently, there’s a fetish site called Watch Girls based on women wearing large watches.  Someone on their forum linked to that post with my full name included and a note that it’s an American blog.  It’s definitely a foreign proclivity, hardly any hits from the USA but the rest of the world is well represented, and they’re still coming in droves.  Check out their Models page -- too funny!

What Happened At Yesterday’s Race
My finish time was an entire minute slower than expected.  Now esplain me this, Lucy:  just 10 days before the race, I did a 3mi tempo run in 21:06 in 75 degree temps.  That’s a pace of 7:02 compared to yesterday’s 6:59 -  just three seconds slower, same conditions.  I don’t run my tempos at 5K pace, so WTF happened yesterday?  Part of it was this:


These are 1/4 mile splits.  My first 1/4 mile was 6:25 but only because I looked at my Garmin, saw 6:16, freaked and put the brakes on.  As you can see, I kept those brakes on for the next mile!  It wasn’t uphill or anything, I was simply unsure of myself and that did me in.  I didn’t even look at my watch after that first mile, I thought I was going as hard as I could sustain.

So I tend to think it was my brain and lack of race practice that were the real culprits here.

Thus, I spent yesterday afternoon searching out summer races and came up with 6 races from June-Aug: five 5Ks and a 5-miler.  Frankly, I dread each and every one of them -- I hate racing in hot weather and these ain’t gonna be cool, but the only way to get over the dread is to face it, or to quote that overused acronym, HTFU.

A final thing worth noting (apologies to my male readers): Last year, a couple weeks after my 5K PR, I raced another 5K and much to my dismay, came in a full minute slower.  That race was 6 days before my period.   Guess what?  I’m expecting my period in 6 days.  So perhaps this was also a possible contributor to the suckage.  Hormones are so confoundedly mysterious.

Saucony Kinvaras!
I’m really not good with shoe reviews, I don’t have smart things to say like “the cushioning felt resistant yet firm while the feedback from arch to blah blah gave a smooth ride and handled blah blah…”  I’m not that observant.  But I’ll say this: I LOVE these shoes!!  Rovatti, you had it right!

Few things: I always wear 1/2 size larger in running shoes, but not in these, they’re size 9s and they feel fantastic.  I have wide-ish feet but they feel very comfortable with enough wiggle room in the toes.  And so incredibly light at 7 oz!  That’s only 1/2 oz. heavier than my racing flats, yet I think they can handle being my regular training shoes from here on in.

I didn’t notice the heel drop per se, though there’s a lot of cushioning on the forefoot and it seemed natural to be running the “new” way in them.  I took ‘em for 7 miles and could have kept going but didn’t want to go too far after a race day.

Design-wise, they have an unusual sheer fabric over the main upper mesh…it’s like running shoe lingerie.  They’re also horribly pink but that’s all the store had.

My Running Gait Video
Memorial Day means nobody was around on the street this morning,  so after my run I took some video to see how my gait’s coming along.  It’s coming along!  Not perfect by any means, but the overstriding is getting under control.  Very pleased.  Btw, I didn’t think much about gait during the race so if I get a photo worth posting, expect to see me overstriding.

This video shows 2 views, 3 speeds for each view.
Edit: for my opinion of what I need to work on from seeing this video, read the comment I made to Jim.

19 Responses to “Conclusion, Kinvaras & Gait Video”

  • rovatti:

    The new gait looks great!

    Glad you dig the Kinvaras. (I’ll expect a percentage of your future cash winnings, BTW.)

    Chicks with big watches – too strange to be true…

    - rovatti

    • Flo:

      Aargh, if I hadn’t flubbed the race so bad yesterday I might have won some, they had real prizes up to the 5th person and she came in at 20:59. If wishes were horses…

  • Ah. Garmin-sabotage.
    Have not scrutinized the video closely yet, but I have seen others that use a wide-angle for the side view, then a zoom setting for the front and rear views. That way, the runner does not recede so fast. No observations on the hormonal stuff. ;)

  • I’ve looked at it some more now. Did you have enough room to get into a good place, gait wise? There’s still a bit of forward lean, although it looks like you are getting your feet under you pretty well now. Heels are definitely coming down first, but I don’t think that’s a big deal. (Pose fans may differ)

    • Flo:

      Yep, had lots of room to get going. Mucho dorsiflexion but the heels aren’t touching the ground first (you probably have to see it frame by frame to realize) so that’s a major step in the right direction. I would like to decrease that dorsiflexion, the arms are too high and aren’t swinging back enough and chest needs to be more “to the sky” (my visual). Also, eventually get the heel higher in back. Lots to work on but not bad for one week of conscious effort.

      I would have used wide angle if my camera was capable, the video function is too simple, though. Didn’t know about using zoom for the other, thanks.

  • Looks like a heel-strike at 00:50, but it’s tricky. Like that science in sport guy says, we need high-speed cameras!

    • Flo:

      We don’t need high-speed cameras, we only need video software, which I have, that takes you frame by frame. On all the views I can dissect, my heel is heading downward but I end up landing flatfoot. It’s a very last second switch.

    • Flo:

      Jim, the clearest place to see the landing is the very last footfall of the whole video since it’s slow mo and closeup.

  • love the video but i’m not going to pretend to be a gait expert. but i liked watching it. i’d be interested in comparing it to a future video though to look at the differences in them.

    re: the race, i think the self-doubt thing probably did do you in a bit. i don’t remember if you’ve said that you’ll be doing lots of short stuff after giving up marathons (i vaguely remember you saying that you’ll concentrate on halfs?) but i also think part of what makes a 5k so hard is that you need to pretty much go all out from the get-go. so i think you started out in the first .25miles perfectly. i read somewhere that mid-distance races are about going out hard then trying to hold on rather than building up over the course of the race.

    still, i think it was an awesome race regardless. but stupid hormones getting in the way! haha

    • Flo:

      Thanks Karyn, you’re absolutely right, I read that too in a Runners World article that going out harder in a 5K for the initial bit is the best way…but it scared me! So used to thinking going out fast is wrong. And yeah, I definitely have confidence issues. Will be posting back with more video as time goes by, maybe in 3 weeks or so.

  • A muse:

    When I think of perfect running form, I think Steve Scott. When I was a kid he was one of my idols, and was notable for his height (relative to other milers) which was quite pronounced since his running form was totally erect. Hello! No, really it seemed odd at the time but the more I learned about “good form” the more I thought about how he had it down. There’s not much, but you can find an ancient race or two on youtube to see it. To see a woman with immaculate form, check out Shalane Flanagan. This will get you started:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afsthN5rgec

    • Flo:

      Thanks Adam, that was fun to see. I looked up Steve Scott too and found a video on him winning the ’82 Dream Mile. Couldn’t find a thing wrong with either of them. ;)

  • Steve Scott makes running a sub-4:00 mile look easy.

  • Steph:

    Cool video! I thought it looked like you were wearing different shoes this morning lol. They look sick

  • Ewen:

    I didn’t spot any Garmins, so maybe strike a pose (like Sabine?) and submit your photo ;)

    I’m convinced enough to at least try on some Kinvaras. The side-on video is a little blurry, but some of the landings look a slightly heel-strikey. Also, from that view, maybe your hips are tilted back a little?

    From the front/rear views, the stride looks pretty good – I’d say midfoot or near enough. A close-up from the side would be interesting – getting 2 landings from about the waist down.

    • Flo:

      We’ll worry about the heel-striking down the road, ok boys? :) This was all about overstriding and getting my feet under me. I’m betting the next progress video I post will look very different from this one. Lol on the lack of Garmin photos for the models, will be doing a photo shoot for that today (kidding, kidding).

  • Jenn:

    Hey Flo, you still digging the Kinvaras? How about that plastic overlay issue? I’ve started walking as of today and hoping to be running in a couple weeks. Been thinking about those purty green Kinvaras that should be available just when I need them!

    Jenn

    • Flo:

      I just came back from testing and decided I need to cut into them, but you probably won’t have that problem, we’re all so different. It’s my feet, always the right one does something…stupid foot.

Leave a Reply

 Subscribe To This Blog Via RSS
Race PRs
5K 20:25 (6/14/09)
5M 35:28 (3/14/09)
10K 42:40 (4/19/09)
Half 1:33:51 (9/20/09)
Marathon 3:28:29 (4/19/10)

Click here for more race times & reports

  • Sign Up For My Newsletter
    and get
    Flo's 103 Fabulous Running Links FREE!
    It's a little running news, a little funny news with tons of letters, spaces and mostly correct punctuation. So sign up today!
    Click here for more info

    Archives
    September 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « Aug    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    27282930  
    Athleta
    Holabird Sports
    RoadID
    REI Outlet