This was a tough book for me to review. The Complete Idiot’s Guide To Marathon Training by David A. Levine and Paula Petrella required temporarily removing my personal beliefs on marathons (that they’re races you train for because you are a runner) in order to accept the concept of marathons as a “bucket list” item.
My trepidation began on the first page of the introduction when I read this, “If you are tired the next day after a workout, you are overtraining.” Uh oh, this does not bode well…
And on page 6, “When running marathons, men generally find inspiration in the goal of lowering their finish time. Women tend to focus on the process more, citing reasons like feeling better about themselves and enjoying the challenge.” I don’t even have a snappy reply for this, it irritates me that much.
Not to say the whole book is full of silliness, there is a good amount of straight info that someone who has never raced will find useful, from explaining what a timing mat is, to gun time vs chip time, to the general subjects found in this type of book (what to wear, nutrition, etc). It also had a nice, easily digestible section on how the body works, muscles, mitochondria, oxygen, fat vs glycogen, etc.
But things like this give me pause: “The most pervasive marathon misconception is that only elite runners are capable of completing a marathon.” Pervasive on what planet? Somebody made that up to support the rest of the paragraph because nobody with a working pair of eyes would ever think that’s true.
In the section on hydration during the marathon “…you need to drink every 10 minutes”. No you don’t.
And this crazy thing “if you are tired the day after a workout you are overtraining” was actually repeated in at least 3 different places. This tells me the authors don’t know what overtraining is, which makes me question their authority. If you’re tired the day after a workout, you’re not even overreaching. For the record, overreaching happens before overtraining (which is a serious condition that happens over a period of months) and it sure as hell isn’t something diagnosed from one tired day. People get tired for tons of reasons that may or may not have to do with exercise.
I also didn’t understand why so many pages were devoted to running form, given the “just get to the finish line” nature of the book. If you’re going to bring concepts like “stance phase” and “recovery phase” into it, photos should be included. I can only imagine someone who’s never run in their life trying to physicalize that section.
Furthermore, including sections on POSE and Chi Running is truly superfluous, as is telling us Galloway suggests keeping your feet close to the ground while running. It left me confused on what the authors recommend. Maybe there is no recommendation but for someone just starting, this has to leave them scratching their heads.
Ditto on the Daniels vs. Lydiard section. It didn’t make a lot of sense to see this in the context of this book. They talk about some Three Day Plan that I guess we should know about but they won’t name, saying it’s based off Daniels but I’m quite sure Daniels would not approve.
If you just want to finish a marathon with no time goal and you want to do the least it takes to get there, then this book might make sense for you. Otherwise, I’d be infinitely more inclined to suggest Bob Glover’s Competitive Runner’s Handbook. It covers all the race distances and is about a subject I hold very near and dear to my heart: Running.






So “Complete Idiot’s guide to Marathon Training” actually means a guide to marathon training written by a complete idiot ?
At any rate, I now know that I am probably overtraining….thanks for the information.
UGH! That thing about women running more for the “process” is so. Sickening. I was going to say exactly what Run2thehills said, namely, might this be a guide *by* a complete idiot rather than *for* a complete idiot?
Funny, I don’t really consider it a workout unless I’m tired the next day.
I teach gender issues in my Sociology class… and I want to SHAKE the authors of this book for perpetuating horrible, antiquated stereotypes. “Women tend to focus on the process more, citing reasons like feeling better about themselves and enjoying the challenge.”
Like we don’t want to compete???
Clearly they haven’t met very many women runners. Otherwise they’d know better than to make such gross over-generalizations.
I would have stopped reading right there. Bravo to you for powering through it anyway.
(wow… just realized what a rant that became. clearly the quote struck a nerve!)
How patronising. I guess if you buy a book with the words “Complete Idiot” in the title, you may be expecting that sort of thing, but it’s disappointing that the book lives up to expectations.
And bah to female runners not being as focused on finishing faster!!
Although I have to give them some credit: it’s a rare book that manages to insult both my intelligence and gender all at once.
Sigh. I see the authors have rather thin résumés. One has a USATF Level 1 coaching certificate, which is the bottom rung and includes very little road racing knowledge. The other has completed exactly one marathon. Couldn’t the publishers have got anyone more experienced than that?
I was going to stay out of the comments section because I didn’t want to pile it on but Jim’s post explains perfectly why the book is as it is. And I just found this funny, strange article on the female author from 2010 that does indeed say she ran ONE marathon 11 years ago! http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/22/sports/la-sp-0323-marathon-bright-20100323
Well that’s about the strangest Rosie Ruiz story I’ve ever heard.
I was going to say that at least it was innocent, but just for shits and giggles I looked in the book and found 2 pictures from the marathon, one of the crowd at the start line and one of drop bags. Both of which could have been taken by any spectator.
Hah! I love this review. I had a bad feeling about this book, and well, there you go.
Second the review for Glover. That’s where I usually send people. From there, then to McMillan or Daniels or the RW forums.
Thanks for the book reviews! Now that I’ve been running almost a year and accomplished a few 5k’s I have two 1/2 marathons I’m pretty seriously starting to think about… one in Nov and one in Feb… so as a new runner I’m always looking for books to read to increase my knowledge… after reading your post just ordered Bob Glover’s beginners runners book… oh curse you Amazon one-click shopping making it so easy to spend money on your couch so late at night
Wow. Just wow. What, running makes you tired?!…Then I guess I’ve been overtrained for like, my whole running career! On a serious note, I should email the author stating what overtraining really feels like-but that’s another story for another time…
Nice, Flo. It’s very refreshing to read an honest review in the blogosphere.
What a hodge-podge of myth and stereotype. The hydration thing is just silly!
I clicked the link above. Incredible. Was she that naive, or just that crafty? Crazy. I’d be PO’d if I were the 2nd person in her AG..Grrr.
As a man who has learned to appreciate “the process” I’d have to ask if the authors had any footnotes linking to any actual papers or surveys about people’s attitudes and misconceptions on marathoning. The stereotypes may irritate you, but I’d like to know if they are living out there in the population of minds.
But overall, I found your review very thoughtful. The concept of having an experienced coach and a running newcomer collaborate on a book targeting first-timers should have been a good one. It sounds like the publisher wasn’t very strict on picking highly-qualified authors for this project.